The Unique Property
Site Blog
2022 is coming. Will it be better than 2021 or worse?
It's time I had another look at the housing market and made a
few stabs at what the new year might have in store for us.
One thing is obvious, and that is, the world is in one hell of a
mess. That is not the best time to buy houses, but what does it
mean? To some extent the world has never been in quite this much
mess since the beginning of the second world war. Let's start by
trying to list where things are in chaos, and then see if we can
see if it is possible for things to get better or to get worse.
And if there is anything we can do about it.
Here are the various areas I will be looking at:
Politics and politicians
Money
Discord and war
Safety
1 Politics and politicians
Politicians are people who think they know better how to run the
world than anybody else. The result of this is that they are the
most dangerous specie on the planet.
The way governments have treated (or should that be mistreated?)
the covid-19 situation is on one level absurd, and on another
pretty well on a par with a bad tempered baby throwing toys out
of its pram. The fallout from this insanity will be with us for
years. Those of us who have other medical problems haven't been
getting treatment, and that includes myself, so I have
first-hand experience of how rather a lot of us are being denied
assistance that we need in various ways. That has caused rather
a lot of unnecessary deaths. It has also raised the suicide
levels through the roof in many countries. The number of deaths
from covid-19 is roughly twice that of normal flu, and well
below the usual level of road accident deaths. To say there has
been an insane over-reaction is hard to ignore.
This all leads to at least two conclusions. First, science is
being side-lined at the same time as it is making great strides
against some very nasty diseases, and people are healthier now
than they have ever been. However, it does seem to be the case
that if you want to get scientific information these days the
go-to places to ask is politicians, who aren't exactly the
brightest or cleverest jokers in the pack.
When I first started studying politics and economics I learned
the rule of unintended consequences. Politicians are
particularly good at pushing ideas that over and over have the
opposite effect of what they were intended to do.
How about a wonderful piece of current absurdity. Never mind
whether climate change is important, or can be altered, let's
look at the idiocies behind the ways politicians are trying to
deal with it. The idea is to focus on garnering sun and wind
power. Sounds great, except that it creates more problems than
it solves. Sun power requires panels spread across land that
could be more practically used to grow food, increases the
world's albedo, and is made from panels that only have an
effective life-span of twenty years, and are made from toxic
chemicals. In a couple of decades' time, how are these things
going to be disposed of without affecting the ground water. The
same is true of batteries needed to store this electricity.
To make matters worse, governments are pressing forward with
encouraging the spread of electric vehicles. How that helps is
hard to explain as somehow the electricity has to be generated
first. That requires coal, gas, or oil, which they are trying to
ban. Last year coal use was up 11% in the US to cope. That makes
a mockery of the original ideas. In other works unexpected
consequences. In other words, total stupidity.
Why does no-one build thorium reactors? No or minimal toxic
waste.
What about fusion technology? One company claims it will have a
fully functioning reactor available by 2024. It can be moved on
the back of a truck, and plugged in to a micro-grid thus
creating a series of autonomous generating systems, which would
reduce the 7% power loss from power lines, and would stop the
blackmail threats that we have recently seen against the current
system.
Naturally, governments aren't interested. Clearly the
politicians have their fingers in a different pie. Make sure
boondoggles go to certain companies so they can invest in those
companies to boost their wealth. Why not? If you draw up the
beneficiaries you know where to invest ahead of the rise.
What this all amounts to is that we are about to see more
unintended consequences as politicians interfere ever more in
the management (or is that mismanagement) of the world. As it is
difficult to imagine just what next piece of stupidity is just
around the corner it is difficult to prepare. One thing however,
is obvious, we need to expect far more chaos, far more wastage
of money, and misallocations of capital, and a consequent
decline in living standards.
If that is how things are likely to pan out over the next few
years then such a decline in living standards will put pressure
on house purchase prices.
In several places there seems to be a move towards socialism,
which costs money rather than making it. As Margaret Thatcher
famously said, "Socialism is a great idea until you run out of
other people's money".
In order to create socialism you have to find a way to make
money. In a socialist environment there is so much interference
and red tape that entrepreneurs go elsewhere, and the riches
follow them. Capitalism provides an environment for progress.
You dont get companies like Amazon and Apple in socialist
countries. They would be banned. Look what happened to people
like Jack Ma in China.
Sadly the world is more unsafe today than it has been for a very
long time. This is the first time in these annual articles that
I have felt it necessary to add a category to include the
possibility of war breaking out. But let's not get ahead of
ourselves.
The real question to ask when it comes to politics is 'which
side will win, governments or business?' If governments win, we
are likely to get some difficult times regarding money, and that
includes digital money. There is likely to be more regulation.
Just look at the regulation most people have put up with over
the past couple of years. Much more of that and there will be a
plethora of bankruptcies. That's really going to improve
economies and therefore wages, isn't it? The level of
bankruptcies is bad enough at the moment, especially in China,
but any more lockdowns and you can welcome in massive inflation,
and collapsed currencies.
What are the odds? Hmm, not the kind of decision-making that
appeals to me. I prefer odds to be in my favour. They clearly
aren't. I would suggest that taking on more debt at this stage
in the game would be unwise.